Sunday, August 19, 2012

What are the real costs of Civil Forfeiture?

It is easy to put up statistics and make yourself look good and the Alberta Attorney General / Solicitor General, Jonathan Denis, has just had help from the Calgary Herald / Edmonton Journal in a feel-good story about the province's Civil Forfeiture Office (CFO) that is full of propaganda-like numbers:

Alberta gives 1.6 million seized from alleged criminals fund

So what are we to make of this?  Instead of just regurgitating figures, let me try to do a little analysis:

For the 5 year existence of the Victims Restitution Compensation Payment Act (VRCPA) the province has apparently seized $25.59 million worth of assets.  Slightly more than $5 million per year seems like a nice number, but wait...that's just what they have slapped preliminary court orders on.

Those ex-parte orders are obtained without giving notice to the property owner and without anybody opposing the CFO lawyers in court.

Not surprisingly, once someone is given an opportunity to come and argue against the government, the legitimacy of the initial seizure (and therefore that $25 million dollar number) doesn't hold up in a number of cases.

That is likely a major reason why of the $25.59 million seized, only $4.4 million (a mere $880 thousand per year) has been actually ordered to be kept by Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta.  The quick math on those two numbers tells us that the CFO has convinced the courts to let it keep a mere 17% of the total value of property it has seized from Albertans.  (Admittedly, some of these cases will still be pending in court, so that percentage will likely go up some).

So why do police and government officials boast success rates of in excess of 95% on these cases?

SuspiciousRealEstate

     "...when police refer a case to a CFO, there is often plenty of evidence that can prove a case to the 
     lower civil threshold of balance of probabilities. This explains, in part, the extremely high success
     rate of CFOs—usually exceeding 95%."

     - Karl Wilberg, Director, Alberta CFO

Is 'success' being able to keep any money no matter how small?  If the CFO keeps $50 to cover photocopying and gives back a million-dollar home to its rightful owner does that count as a win?

I don't know, but if the former Justice Minister, now Premier Redford, is running such a transparent government, I think she should ensure that citizens of this province get the straight answers on this whole CFO program.  Can Minister Denis prove to us in black and white that the net balance sheet for taxpayers is actually not in the red?

Of course, one of the issues is that when the CFO swipes a house or a car there is often a bank that is first in line to collect proceeds.  But they know that up front in most cases because there is a registered mortgage or lien on the property.  So why report the big figure of $25.59 million at all?

Maybe part of the concern is ensuring that the program charges ahead and gets bigger every year without a full cost / benefit analysis?

Think about it; the "over 550 cases" the CFO says it has opened don't run themselves, they get handled by lawyers, who have offices, assistants, pensions and benefit plans.  There has been reported to be over a dozen Crown lawyers doing CFO seizure work in Alberta.  A senior Crown lawyer in Alberta can make more than $160,000.00 in salary alone.  Even if I really push the figures down, look at where we get:

10 lawyers making an average salary of $100,000.00 per year is a full million dollars worth of overhead.  If the average salary and head counts are higher, then this number gets way worse.

So, not counting any of the other stuff like support staff and employee benefits, the CFO is conceivably burning well over a million dollars every year and to date has successfully had forfeited only $880,000.00 annually.

This would mean once all actual costs are factored in the Alberta taxpayer could be going under by multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars every year by chasing money to use for victims programs.  But, again, these figures do not reconcile with Mr. Wilberg's public statements that his CFO brings in $1.50 for every $1.00 it spends.

When crime pays...us

     "Vehicle cases are “money-loser files” because the province has to pay towing and impound
     charges and other related fees, acknowledges Wilberg.

     But the plentiful cash-seizure cases make up for the vehicle losses. Overall, the program brings in
     $1.50 for every $1 spent by taxpayers on the initiative."

Where does he get the data for that statement?  I think the best I can say in trying to assess all of this is that we need the CFO to produce raw data so that critics and not just boosters of the civil forfeiture regime can fully analyze the real cost to Albertans.

I mean, on one of the first cases I was involved with under the VRCPA, the full value of the senior citizen's condo was given back to her and the CFO ended up minus more than $86,000.00 in costs that they had to repay to her.

On another, the CFO voluntarily gave back my client's BMW X5.  On yet another, they voluntarily dropped the seizure against my client's family home.  More recently, my client sold a seized property with the consent of the CFO and the matter was resolved by the vast majority of the proceeds being returned to him.

The bottom line, for me, is if this program is as good as the government says it is, then open the books for us all to revel in its splendor.  Let us see the actual revenue in against the expenditures out.  This legislation has been controversial since its inception, the CFO has suffered some setbacks
in court, and contrary to popular talking points, the actual constitutionality of the Alberta VRCPA is only just starting to be judged by the courts (and certainly has not been approved by the Supreme Court of Canada).

Regardless, just because Alberta can seize property from its citizens - guilty of a crime or not - doesn't mean that it should; especially if the real costs outweigh the benefits.


Michael Bates
Calgary Criminal Lawyer

27 Comments:

Blogger Laurice said...

However, for the sick and the elderly, it may be virtually impossible to obtain permanent residency unless they happen to be extremely wealthy, with a liquid net worth of at least a few million dollars being the minimum requirement. Even then, the Canadian Government currently takes only five hundred passive investor immigrants each year.

www.calgary-divorce-lawyers.ca

12:15 PM  
Blogger calgaryimmigration said...

Nice post!Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us about wills Calgary.

People are very mobile now adays. A person may be from Brazil, work in Canada, and have property in the US. Such a person naturally wonders whether his will drafted and signed in Alberta will be recognized in other jurisdictions. Unfortunately, I cannot give a definitive answer to this question. A will drafted in Alberta is likely perfectly valid in the US. The reason for this is Canada and the US share a legal history that originates from the English common wills and estate planning . Though different jurisdictions have different wills legislation, a will drafted with Alberta law in mind is likely acceptable in the various US states.

Alternatively, you may consider other forms of ownership, such as trusts and corporations that will allow you to avoid estate administration in certain jurisdictions.

Thanks again for your informative post.Looking forward for your post about wills.

Keep up the good work!

2:17 AM  
Anonymous bblawyers said...

I truly like to reading your post. Thank you so much for taking the time to share such a nice information.

8:50 AM  
Blogger Willard Catalan said...

It is easy to see why you should consider getting a lawyer. The attorneys are experts who generate their living by understanding information of some dui cases or any other cases.

And if your in a marketing dui, firm marketing and law firm marketing that needs to lock-out your competitors , then you should Buy DUI Leads it will help you increase your chances to have more pre-qualified prospects and find more local customers by increasing your local internet leads on any of your DUI law firm businesses.

4:35 PM  
Blogger Mark Martin said...

Hi! I will be looking forward to visit your page again and for your other posts as well. Thank you for sharing your thoughts about lawyer in your area. I am glad to stop by your site and know more about lawyer. Keep it up! This is a good read.
Arguing a client's case before a judge or jury in a court of law is the traditional province of the barrister in England, and of advocates in some civil law jurisdictions. However, the boundary between barristers and solicitors has evolved. In England today, the barrister monopoly covers only appellate courts, and barristers must compete directly with solicitors in many trial courts. In countries like the United States that have fused legal professions, there are trial lawyers who specialize in trying cases in court, but trial lawyers do not have a de jure monopoly like barristers. In some countries, litigants have the option of arguing pro se, or on their own behalf. It is common for litigants to appear unrepresented before certain courts like small claims courts; indeed, many such courts do not allow lawyers to speak for their clients, in an effort to save money for all participants in a small case. In other countries, like Venezuela, no one may appear before a judge unless represented by a lawyer. The advantage of the latter regime is that lawyers are familiar with the court's customs and procedures, and make the legal system more efficient for all involved. Unrepresented parties often damage their own credibility or slow the court down as a result of their inexperience.

We are prepared to consult you on:

• Automobile Accidents
• Motorcycle Accidents
• Dog Bites
• Restraining Order Violations
• Property Accidents
• Criminal Defense
• Drunk Driving Defense
• Divorce and Separation
• Family Law

Lawyer Middleton MA

11:20 AM  
Blogger Alissa Banks said...

I know I had a brother who used a criminal lawyer in calgary do help him keep his estate but it was a big hassle and I wish he didn't need to do that!

1:54 PM  
Blogger Shanna White said...

Thanks for the heads up! I love your blog and how it focuses all on lawyers from calgary.

5:20 PM  
Blogger Suzy Frame said...

Thanks for sharing this information! I have been looking intoregistry calgary and how it can help me be more aware! I didn't realize how many aspects it affects! Can you tell me where I can find more information like this? Thanks!

2:14 PM  
Blogger Globerlaw Jacksonville said...

Hi this is globerlaw

Hi this Blog is very nice, thanks for Sharing with us here:-Civil Trial Lawyer ,Civil Trial Lawyer,Jacksonville trial lawyer,Jacksonville attorney.

11:49 PM  
Blogger MrWatson Leona said...

Engrossing substance I haven't been finished specified info in a lasting time.
http://www.levinson-axelrodlawyers.net

11:56 PM  
Blogger demony granger said...

Nice blog, thanks for sharing the information. I will come to look for update. Keep up the good work.

criminal lawyer beverly ma

12:35 AM  
Blogger Umtonhin hin said...

It is easy to put up statistics and make yourself look good and the Alberta Attorney General / Solicitor General, Jonathan Denis, has just had ... workers comp lawyer

9:16 PM  
Blogger Karen Ross said...

Hey there, I found your information on civil forfeiture very interesting. Thanks for sharing.

Personal Injury Attorney Las Vegas

10:24 PM  
Blogger Roger Pace said...

I found your article insightful! I have been researching on where to find the best place to find lawyers in Calgary. Thank you for posting this!

11:02 AM  
Blogger Layne Adams said...

Hi there! great stuff, I'm glad that I drop by your page and found these very interesting and informative. Thanks for sharing, keep it up!


Lawyer Salem MA

9:33 PM  
Blogger Sean Reever said...

What a great post on lawyers calgary.

8:40 PM  
Blogger Aldrich brucea said...

This is my first time go to see at here and i am genuinely pleassant to read everthing about law at one place.
boulder lawyer child support

3:14 AM  
Blogger Bryant carter said...

it would be unwise to deprive them of basic legal services just on the premise of cost-cutting.
boulder duo attorney

12:48 AM  
Blogger Ashlyine Brooke said...

The information in this blog is extremely useful for the people.
online payday loan lenders

2:19 AM  
Blogger cheys mosley said...

This is very good information a really nice blog. keep it up!!!
boston criminal attorney

2:33 AM  
Blogger Frank James said...

This is my first time go to see at here and i am genuinely pleassant to read everthing about law at one place.


321 Ocean Condo Miami | 321 Ocean Miami | 321 Ocean South Beach

2:52 AM  
Blogger Chuck Brown said...

I'm with Shanna great blog on a great criminal lawyer in Calgary! Keep up the good work!

11:43 AM  
OpenID katysewell12 said...

Thank you for your post! You've shared a lot of helpful information and I know it will help me find a great lawyer in Calgary .

5:52 PM  
Blogger Jim Stout said...

This was a really good article from a great lawyer in Calgary. Keep up the great work!

12:35 PM  
Blogger Jayden Eden said...

Interesting information. Thank you so much. I like reading on this lawyer in Calgary Thanks again!

7:50 PM  
Blogger Lucretia Huggins said...

What a great blog it is!!! You are in truth on your way to colossal success. Well done. SAN ANTONIO EXPUNCTION LAWYER

6:14 AM  
Blogger Micheal Clark said...

The vital information in this blogs has allured me.
dwi ny

10:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home